|
"Despite over 60 years
of clinical experience with NMD, there are no prospective, controlled
evaluations of NMD that might provide Category 1 evidence upon which
to base treatment evaluations."
"Despite 50 years of NMD,
the general quality of the outcome data is poor. There are no published,
randomised, prospective, controlled trials of modern operations."
"Adverse Effects - There
are few studies dedicated to looking at these issues and much of
the reporting can be criticised for lacking independence and a structured
approach."
The above sentences are chilling. They
are taken from the 2001 Annual Report of the Neurosurgery for Mental
Disorder (NMD) in Dundee and the Report for the Royal College of
Psychiatrists - June 2000.
 |
|
1949
eye socket lobotomy - sticking jaggy instruments through the
eye socket and swishing them around the brain - it wasn't
rocket science
|
NMD is Neurosurgery for Mental
Disorder. Alternatively, it is the clinical destruction of brain
tissue in order to "treat" mental illness.
What the extracts say to FirstFoot is "aye,
we know we've been hacking away at loonies brains with scalpels
and lasers for half a century and more, but we don't really know
what good or harm it does 'cos we've never bothered to find out."
As a reward for this seemingly casual
destruction of various parts of the brains of the seriously mentally
ill, the Scottish Executive has slipped in a wee bill that proposes
that patient consent is no longer needed before the brain scrambling
is performed.
So, that's all right then. The medical
profession would seem to have no empirical evidence that burning
loonies brains has any beneficial effect. "But, carry on guys,
and by the way, just do it when you want." " Patient consent,
don't be silly. They're only bloody lunatics, they don't have to
give consent."
No wonder the public is increasingly
suspicious of politicians. If they cannot protect the most vulnerable
members of society, it doesn't fill the rest of us with optimism.
FirstFoot proposes an alternative bill.
At each election for the Scottish Parliament, the electorate should
also have the right to vote for the politician who would benefit
most from a wee bit of heid mince.
Anyone who feels that another wee parly
e-mail protest campaign is in order, please use the Forum to express
your views.
|